« Home | Local DJ asks listeners how to "get rid" of Cindy ... » | Published » | Dirty PoliTricks » | 'X' Marks the Spot? » | Perverting Justice » | Lying Liars! » | Blackmail and the minimum wage » | Retort » | Cops infiltrate another peace group » | Protester interrupts Iraqi PM's speech to Congress... »

Which one of these is a real plane crash?

Okay, I admit it. I am, as of today, a HUGE skeptic of the official 9/11 story. I have been browsing through the massive evidence cache used in the Zacarias Moussaoui trial, and a couple things are disturbing me ...

For instance: This is a plane crash ...

So, that's my point of reference, as I have never seen one in real life. Now, how does the image below look anything like a plane crash?

This is where United 93 is said to have gone down. So, where's the plane? Where are the parts? The debris field? The bodies? The flames? It looks, to me, like a hole in the ground.

There is some additional material in the 9/11 evidence archive that confused me as well. For instance, these are the only two distinguishable airplane parts, aside from the flight recorder, found at the United 93 crash site ...
Those look an awful lot like the "airplane parts" found at the Pentagon ...

Some say the round engine piece is part of the Global Hawk, a remote-controlled UAV. Additionally, both of those shreds of siding are miscolored and do not exactly match the paint on United or American airlines planes.

I could sit here and hypothesize all day, only to wind up miles away from where I need to be, which is at home. But let it be known that the Muckraker no longer believes anything about 9/11 on face value. I'm officially a skeptic.

Links to this post

Create a Link

The Weird, Turned Pro.

Created by The Gonzo Muckraker
Based in Dallas, Texas
More about the author.

Stories I'm Digging today ...