« Home | Voting info » | A picture worth 1,000 words (and then some) » | Happy Birthday, John Lennon » | Rumsfield gave N. Korea nuke technology? » | Four weeks 'till endgame ... » | 11 minutes of truth » | Say it with me -- Liberal Bounce » | Rating Burgess' votes » | Protesters gather at Congressman's office » | GOPedophile-gate continues »

Iraq death toll off the charts

I saw this report on C-Span's Washington Journal this morning and almost had to run to the toilet. This is the most revolting thing I could possibly imagine. From this morning's Washington Post ...

A team of American and Iraqi epidemiologists estimates that 655,000 more people have died in Iraq since coalition forces arrived in March 2003 than would have died if the invasion had not occurred.

The estimate, produced by interviewing residents during a random sampling of households throughout the country, is far higher than ones produced by other groups, including Iraq's government.

It is more than 20 times the estimate of 30,000 civilian deaths that President Bush gave in a speech in December. It is more than 10 times the estimate of roughly 50,000 civilian deaths made by the British-based Iraq Body Count research group.


This is about 500 unexpected violent deaths per day throughout the country.


While acknowledging that the estimate is large, the researchers believe it is sound for numerous reasons. The recent survey got the same estimate for immediate post-invasion deaths as the early survey, which gives the researchers confidence in the methods. The great majority of deaths were also substantiated by death certificates.

"We're very confident with the results," said Gilbert Burnham, a Johns Hopkins physician and epidemiologist.

A Defense Department spokesman did not comment directly on the estimate.

The rest of the sickening truth.

Links to this post

Create a Link

The Weird, Turned Pro.

Created by The Gonzo Muckraker
Based in Dallas, Texas
More about the author.

Stories I'm Digging today ...